Time Out

My father looks confused more than anything else.

At age 92 entropy and exhaustion will catch up to you. Two years ago he could do anything a 70-year old could do, just a few months ago he could get on an airplane. Somewhere in that period, it seemed to me at least, he kind of stopped caring, that the cumulative impact of 92 years on the Blue Planet just weighed too much.

I’ve seen it before with my grandparents (especially with my mother’s mother, who was the Last Nonni Standing). I would watch them on holidays or other occasions when the larger family was together. The kids would play with kids, teens would join in their circle of loathing and eye rolling, parents would talk about work and cars. Grandparents sat on the edge, mostly watching. I thought it was the language barrier — that after fifty or sixty years English had never quite taken hold and the constant racket of a world full of movies and Pong was just too much for people who were born into a society that didn’t even have radios.

But that wasn’t it. They had simply been moved by age and infirmity out of the flow of Everyday. While they were in their 60s and even 70s they could shop and cook and sort of read the American newspapers (the recounting of articles was sometimes not quite right. I learned I had to check). It had been a while since they’d had jobs, seeing and learning new things daily. At some point the tiredness made it too difficult to keep up with the foreignness — and that had nothing to do with living in a country other than the one in which they’d started. They found other goals to keep them going, say, waiting for great grandchildren. At some point that was no longer enough, they were other people’s doings. The grandkids were settled and raising their own families. The o,dest generation decided they were done. After that it was just a matter of clock ticks.

Physicists, who I don’t really understand, will tell you that time as we think of it doesn’t exist. They somehow multiply and divide fractions — fractions comprising letters rather than numbers, even letters to the second and third power — and figure out what happens to two people standing on different sides of the universe at the same moment. One guy takes a step, the second hand moves once. But the fractions and letters and powers say that the moving man isn’t lined up one second away from the other. He’s something like two hundred years away.

Which doesn’t mean that time isn’t real, it just means we created it to put changes into a linear order. What time is, at least some of these physicists say, is the way we measure entropy — things falling apart. This is somehow connected to the Big Bang and the continual expansion of the universe. We frequently hear people say things like “I feel the same as when I was eighteen.” Well, of course they do. The crossing off of days on a calendar doesn’t match the rate at which their bodies are changing or, more precisely, falling to crap. How else would one explain two forty-year-olds, one of whom is youthful and the other enfeebled? By measurement of time their bodies should “age” at the same rate, but they don’t. Some of us fall apart more quickly than others.

When my father was seventy-nine he was found to have cancer at the junction of the stomach and esophagus. Doctors chopped out about a third of the former and the bottom part of the latter. Then they yanked what was left of the stomach up to what was left of the esophagus and tied them together. A year or two later he was playing tennis again. He didn’t stop playing for another eight years, until he lost a portion of his eyesight to what they call macular degeneration — essentially a black hole In his field of vision. The hole took away tennis — he couldn’t see the ball coming at him. More important is it also seemed to take away his desire to paint.

My dad has been an artist his whole life and his best work is what he did most recently – large, colorful abstracts of what look like balls of energy hovering like barbed sunsets over a suggestion of land. But when the macular degen came the painting stopped. For Father’s Day in 2011 I bought him a blank canvass, hoping it would generate interest to get back to work. It’s still blank.

His body had stopped holding itself together. It didn’t matter how “old” he was, what mattered was that he couldn’t do what he enjoyed. He slowed down. He moved to the periphery as his parents had before him, and as you and I will should we not get hit by an even worse fate.

The kids chatter, their parents complain about work and war. The oldest chime in when everyone else pauses to take a breath.

He fell last week, in Florida, where it likely happens enough that it sounds to Charon like he lives under a percussion section. All reports indicated that dad was at the gate we all eventually reach. I flew down. He seems to improve by the day, I think spurred by my mother’s threat of a feeding tube and nursing home. He’s showing the kind of fight I hadn’t seen from him in two years.

But there’s the look of confusion. His brain is strong and sharp and when he has his energy he can converse, more each day. He may stick around a while, which would be very lucky for us all. But his eyes ask how the hell he got there, and why. How many times have you asked yourself what our time here is about, who put us on the earth and whether it’s one of many worlds or one big self-referring circle? And as we reach the end, when our bodies give in to entropy or universe expansion or whatever, we still don’t know. We realize that we will never know. That’s a crueler fate than if there’s only oblivion on the Other Side. Oblivion is…nothing. You can’t even be disappointed by it. But the unanswered question — what was is all about? — torments us up until the last seconds.

Posted in Rabble Babble | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Mirror, Mirror

At some point the American People have to start looking in a mirror. Yeah, as was said a few hundred years ago, the fault for so much we think wrong lies in ourselves.

Yesterday’s New York Times ran an article about the huge payoff by Penn State to football coach Joe Paterno. The essence of the piece was that after the Sandusky scandal broke:

Mr. Paterno was to be paid $3 million at the end of the 2011 season if he agreed it would be his last. Interest-free loans totaling $350,000 that the university had made to Mr. Paterno over the years would be forgiven as part of the retirement package. He would also have the use of the university’s private plane and a luxury box at Beaver Stadium for him and his family to use over the next 25 years… In the end, the board of trustees — bombarded with hate mail and threatened with a defamation lawsuit by Mr. Paterno’s family — gave the family virtually everything it wanted, with a package worth roughly $5.5 million.

It’s time for the public to admit that big-time college sports is one of the most soul-less, money-driven enterprises in our society, certainly the most hypocritical (with its incessant PR bullsht about “student athletes”). I can’t think of one other industry where the public would clamor to reward someone who covered up child molestation – not even in professional sports, which is soul-less but at least isn’t hypocritical, or the Catholic Church (hypocritical but probably not soul-less).

Colleges make millions of dollars by exploiting kids — most of them under 21 — and pissing them back onto the street, uneducated. Is it really a surprise that a business model of using kids as profit-fodder would produce people who believe children are toys available for whatever pleasure they want? *

I remember reading an article about the first Jo-Pa-free game at Penn State. A guy with a sign criticizing the university was threatened and harassed and people took pictures of their children standing next to a Hussein-esque Paterno statue.

Let’s be clear: what happens to former “student athletes” is the fault of every fan of college sports, just as the Paterno supporters are ultimately responsible for the Sandusky affair — they created the forgive-anything-if-you-win mindset with their non-questioning adulation of the sports program.

If only sports were the sole example of the public denying blame for what they’ve created. In October, during the bombardment of negative political-campaign advertising, you will hear several people say they “wish there were another choice, I don’t like any of them**.” This is often said by the very same people who say they don’t like, and aren’t influenced by, negative advertising. The only sensible response to give to such a person is “Um, really, you wouldn’t like them, either.” It does no use to point out that the candidates are before them because they were chosen through a democratic process, that they didn’t fall onto the ballot from a fruit wagon. The idea that politicians are somehow foisted on an innocent and undeserving public is one of the biggest self-delusions in American history.***

I’m pretty sure this is born of a natural human resistance to accept blame and it’s reinforced by TV hacks who say things like “The American people ultimately get it right” when making electoral choices. This is palpable nonsense, easily proved wrong by pointing to the US Congress — about which the American people will complain endlessly, and then re-elect 95% of them because they like their own incumbent.****

When Jimmy Carter ran in 1976 he said he wanted to give the country “a government as good as its people.” That’s pretty much the problem. It’s what we have.

___________

*in fairness to the NCAA, graduation rates at division 1 schools for “all sports” are about 82%. But the rates for sports that make the money — football and basketball — are below 70%.

**well, they won’t really say “were”, they’ll say “was”. People hate the subjunctive tense.

***although, Zoroaster knows, there’s lots of competition, my favorite being that our foreign policy is intended to spread democracy and prosperity for other countries. This is proven false every time a senator or president says America has no “vital interest” in the troubles in some forlorn land (or when we arm dictators and train their death squads).

****not to mention the inexcusable re-election of George W. Bush or that the people of Providence, R.I. re-elected ex-Mayor Vincent “Buddy” Cianci when he was released from prison for taking time out of his previous mayoral duties to kidnap and torture someone with fireplace logs.

Posted in Rabble Babble | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Should Presidents Kill People?

There is an article in this month’s Esquire called “The Lethal Presidency of Barack Obama” by Tom Junod. It’s not yet available on the magazine’s website.

It is about the drone attacks, the extralegal executions OK’d by B.O. , our Commander-In-Chief and Leader of the Democratic Party.

I always thought it was stupid to invade Afghanistan, that it would make more sense to just set up shop somewhere and get the bad guys. Given the mess we still have there, i figure i was right. But I wasn’t thinking about drones, I’m not sure they existed, but they’re even better for the get-the-bad-guy approach given that the possibility of American casualties is negligible. As a way of making war it is certainly no more immoral than dropping bombs all over the place and blowing up schools and hospitals and weddings and the like. You get dead civilians either way and you probably get fewer of them with the drones.

And yet.

If we are making specific people targets for assassination, and especially if they’re US citizens, it seems reasonable to expect there be some sort of judicial process to approve taking the case to the President before putting someone on the kill list. The administration says its own review process is enough – well, maybe it is if B.O. is president, but it certainly would not be if Dick Cheney were.

If we use judges to issue warrants and approve wire taps, why can’t we do the same for this? It doesn’t have to be an exhaustive trial, just present credible (and confirmed) evidence and — voila! — another human target for the Flying Executioners. At least there’d be a process.

Nixon bombed Cambodia and lied about it. The Reagan administration traded arms for hostages and re-routed money and guns to assassination squads in Central America who killed children and students and women and even American nuns. Daddy Bush deposed the President of Panama for who-knows-what-reason. Clinton left the 1992 campaign trail to make sure Arkansas executed a guy with mental disabilities. Baby Bush, well, those wounds are fresh.

I don’t want people like that deciding, all by themselves, who gets to breathe tomorrow.

Aside | Posted on by | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Not Going To Pot

Too bad about the demise of the proposal to decriminalize possession of small amounts of marijuana in New York State. It would have even been ok if they had just done it for New York City – and by Friday.

Decriminalization of pot is fair and treats people like adults. I would rather have it legalized, though, and here’s why: even though it seems an increasing amount of weed is grown right here in the USA, I’m sure a healthy percentage comes from or through Mexico. Mexican drug gangs do things like decapitate the innocent family members of rivals, shoot cops and throw babies off bridges. I don’t want two cents going to those people. Legal pot would (a) put them out of business, (b) let us control what is actually in the stuff, and (c) let us tax it.

If people’s behavior affects others, like driving badly, then punish them for that, not for how they got wasted. Otherwise alcohol should be illegal, too. Plus, colleges shouldn’t have to be pot police. It’s a waste of everyone’s time. The same goes for the Reagan-imposed 21-year-old drinking age (there’s President Personal Freedom for ya).  At a minimum they should lower the drinking age on college campuses only.

[Note: I am aware of the unfairness of giving this just to campus kids and it has practical problems. People will think this is horribly classist or racist, but ask yourself this:  where would people -- of any age, race or economic level -- prefer to find themselves alone at 2:00 a.m., the Fordham University campus or the streets around it? Spoiled college kids arent angels but more bad things are done by kids aged 18-22 in poor neighborhoods. Hey, it might even be a new incentive for studying while in high school.]

I could probably be convinced to lower the drinking age to something like 14 while increasing the driving age to something like 20. I might be the only person in the country who thinks this, but binge drinking would more likely be finished by the time kids drive. In Italy kids drink at a young age and there isn’t a lot of binging or alcoholism, at least not compared to what goes on here in Reaganland. So, what’s the connection? Gun lovers who excuse the high murder rate in this country compared to Europe say “it’s not the guns, it’s cultural”.

They should agee with me on this. But I’m fairly certain most don’t.

Posted in Rabble Babble | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Shrink Rap

When the Pollock painting in their brains gets too jumbled millions of Americans go to a professional – the kind that sits in a chair and nods sagely and may even offer advice.

There seem to be three options for this unburdening: trained therapists, priests and hairdressers.

Therapist-types have certain things in common with at least one other profession, prostitution. As with a shrink, prostitutes really care about your happiness; they want to make you feel good – but only as long as you’re paying them. I’m not saying that decent psychiatrists won’t care if you spiral into lunacy once you’re no longer giving them money – just that they won’t schedule a time when they’d have to be in a room with you.

Therapists and call-girls also share a rather unique relationship with the concept of time. Mind doctors charge by the hour – and the hour is about 45 minutes long. Similarly, I doubt that most johns fill an hour before concluding their, um, transactions.

[Obligatory disavowal: I have never had business or any other kind of interaction with a whore, unless you count the conversation at my high school reunion at which I sat at a table with an ex-classmate who had reputedly spent several decades as a hooker in Las Vegas. When I asked what she does for a living she responded that she works “with tour groups”. I couldn’t help but think “Yes, and I’ll bet you've held several interesting positions.”]

There is, of course, a similarity between modern psychological therapy and Catholic confessionals. There is the same need to recount your horrible transgressions, the same plea (stated or not) that “I’m not a bad person, I want to be good,  and I will try not to sin again” — and the same faith that a hand wave will make everything all better (although with a modern American therapist the hand is yours and the wave is the movement it makes as it signs a check).

Grudgungly, perhaps, one has to grant that confession was probably the first effort to get people to face their bad stuff by talking about it out loud. It was an early form of psychiatry, albeit one that insists on honoring mothers instead of blaming them for everything. Before confession a person foolish enough to admit to failings would be fed to lions, which does not offer a possibility of feeling better after the session.

But the the real professional listeners are hairdressers. There is something about the intimacy of a person shampooing and running her fingers through their hair that makes people want to spit out the details of their personal lives. As far as I know, unlike therapists and priests, the hairdressers have taken no oath of beautician omerta’, so if you tell them anything you’re taking a risk that everyone in town will hear about it.

Hairdressers hear about people’s marital problems and love affairs, their career disasters, their medical afflictions. One told me of a client who dated a man with a family that owned a funeral parlor. When the woman went to meet his family the hosts thought it would be useful to have a little get-together, but not enough friends were available that evening. His aunt solved the problem by collecting a few dead bodies, dressing them nicely and propping them up in chairs around the house. The woman claims not have married into this particular mental storm drain.

I cannot swear to you that this story is true, but the hairdresser does. I find certain advantages in going to an event in which I don’t have to force conversation with the partygoers, but even I have to say that filling the room with dead people is probably not the best way to avoid awkward social situations. There are cadaver-free options that would offer similar comfort – for instance, filling the room with deaf-mutes.

Therapy is helpful to millions of people and it’s a valid and thriving profession. In fact, unless you’re a practicing Catholic there probably isn’t anywhere else where you can go to unburden yourself without having your business blabbered all over town, except maybe if you have a blog almost nobody reads.

Thanks for listening.

Posted in Rabble Babble | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Safe and Soundless

Try hearing this all your life: “Oh, you’re so cynical.” Try going to counselors and doctors and coaches and hearing this: “Do you consider yourself to be cynical?”

It could give a guy a complex.

My answer to the question is “No, but everybody else does.” Just because I think horrible things could happen doesn’t mean I  expect them to. In fact, the opposite is true: I expect things to work out because they pretty much always have. Besides, to mention the worst possible outcome is sort of like grabbing a talisman to ward it off.

There is a, um, slight exception to my sunny optimism and it’s that life pretty much always ends badly. You can be as Pollyanna as you want, but unless you die in your sleep or keel over without having been ill things are generally going to be awful at the end. About the best you can hope for is to only be terribly sick for a short period.

Now that’s something to look forward to.

My parents live in a condominium complex in which the bylaws state the occupants must be at least 55-years old – but I’ve never seen anyone there that doesn’t look 103. They’re gray and bent and their skin is almost translucent. I call it the Old Folks Home and it is almost always silent*. The old people like silence, I’ve discovered, and they hate surprises. I’m fairly certain they hate surprises because they never know when the Big Surprise is coming.

Quiet inspires a feeling of safety and when you’re old you want security most of all. It’s not easy to feel safe if there are teenagers in the halls blasting music about beating bitches and shooting Tech-9s.

It is difficult to look at old people and remember that they were once 20, 40, even 50 years old and could jump on rocks to get across a stream or charm someone into bed. It’s frightening to think that they were confident and strong until they woke up one day to find their bodies had fallen to crap and from then on would be at the mercy of any young thug who might want to knock them over.

They are afraid and they want to live in places, like the Old Folks Home, where nobody young will create problems. Who can blame them?

The Old Folks Home is different from my parents’ complex in Florida, which is best described as sort of a dormitory for elderly people. They do things like sit by the pool or on benches and stroll and chat. They laugh and chuckle and tell stories. It’s a non-stop frat party, except that the parking lot is full of Buicks and nobody is smoking marijuana.

Self-help books and wise counselors will point out that whether in a dormitory or a silent fortress the old people are generally “living in the moment” and enjoying themselves, taking things “day by day”. This is not reassuring.  Looking at really old people is a reminder that you are soon going to be in the same boat – a boat in which nobody will remember how cool your haircut was or how smoothly you could banter. It’s a terrifying prospect. In my years wandering around this blue planet I’ve heard a lot of different opinions on all sorts of topics – one person likes summer, another likes winter. But I’ve never heard one person anywhere say they can’t wait to be old and debilitated.

Once in a while some Funnyman will say “Well, it beats the alternative, ho, ho!” Yeah, I guess so — for most of us the thought of being dead is even worse than being old. If you’re old and can’t do much you can still, for instance, sit in front of your 150 channels. But being dead either means oblivion or a destination for your soul that has a fifty percent chance of being perdition. Compared to an eternity in hell, living in an Old Folks Home isn’t so bad.**

____________

* Unless you count the occasional scream of an ambulance, which is like an announcement that another condo may soon be on the market.

** People have ridiculous concepts of hell. The most popular version is the one with fire and devils who do things like stick barbed wire in your butt, like, forever. Another popular view is “Maybe we are in hell now!” I think it’s generally said as a kind of joke, but talk about cynical.

Speaking of dead people and their destinations, I once met a guy from Falls Church, Virginia. I said “Isn’t that where Jerry Fallwell was from?” He said, yes, and reminded me that the Reverend Fallwell had recently died and moved onto another world. “Yeah,” I said, “I bet he was surprised.”

Posted in Rabble Babble | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Let 12 Randomly Selected People With No Place Else To Go Sort ‘Em Out

One of the madmen who massacred a family in their home in Cheshire, Connecticut was found guilty last week and will likely be sentenced to death. Let’s get this out of the way: he and his accomplice certainly deserve it.

They broke into a house, beat the father, raped the mother and at least one of two teenage daughters, who they tied to their beds. They poured gasoline on the girls and set the place on fire. Here’s how bad it was: the attorney for one of these monsters held a press conference in which he said he wanted to reassure the victims’ family that the murdered eleven-year old had not been anally raped by his client. That was the comfort.

The world won’t miss these guys and nobody will be sad when they’re executed. But that’s not the same thing as believing that the State should kill them.

Imagine standing before a crowd of conservatives and saying “I have a solution to a problem. There is no evidence it has any impact on the problem, it costs more than the alternative and it gives government the ultimate power over an individual”. The conservatives would be appalled, until you tell them it’s the death penalty. Then they’d say “Oh, wait – I like that one.”

Because it’s all about revenge, and revenge makes us feel better. That may be a good enough reason to believe in hell, but it’s not a good enough reason to let government take lives. The existence of hell doesn’t depend on whether you believe in it.

As A Deterrent

I have heard many people say “I believe the death penalty is a deterrent”, as if saying it makes it a fact. They say “there are studies that show both sides”. This is like people who say “the scientific community is divided on evolution”, i.e. it is nonsense.

There is no evidence of a deterrent effect in states with the death penalty. States with no death penalty have lower murder rates than death-penalty states. [1] 

Point that beats boring statistics: is there one person, even a deranged person, who would say “Hmmm…I wasn’t going to shoot this guy and eat his intestines, but as I’m only going to get life without parole, hey, what the hell”? 

The Cost

People who love the death penalty say things like “Why should I pay taxes to keep this scum in prison. Just kill ‘em!” They sneer, too, as part of a whole tough-guy thing. Except that studies show it costs more to kill criminals than it does to keep them in prison for life. [2]

Part of the reason is that death penalty cases allow for lots of appeals. Sure, you can cut down on those, but you run the risk of killing more innocent people.  Mistakes happen. Is that the trade you want to make?  [3] 

Ultimate Power

A system of justice that conducted the two O.J. trials is simply not competent to decide whether a human being should live or die. Americans enjoy running around saying how awful government is at everything it tries to do. It can’t do healthcare, it can’t fix the economy…but it can decide who lives and dies?

**************                .

Look, either killing people is wrong or it isn’t. I get that people sometimes have to kill to protect themselves or others, say in a war against Hitler. But this isn’t that kind of choice. The Connecticut killers aren’t going to be back on the street, ever. The commandment isn’t “Thou Shall Not Kill Unless You’re Really Pissed Off”.   


[1] http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/deterrence-states-without-death-penalty-have-had-consistently-lower-murder-rates.

[2] The Texas Department of Criminal Justice has a webpage on which it lists the last statements of the criminals it has killed. It used to have a page where it listed their last meals, too. Texas kills criminals like crazy; it practically has an electric couch.

[3] http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/costs-death-penalty

[4] A group called The Innocence Project works to exonerate people who have wrongly been convicted of crimes, using things like DNA evidence (innocenceproject.org). They have all sorts of statistics and such.

634BF6XCK5ZJ


Posted in Rabble Babble | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

For Really Smart and Attractive People Only

There was a column in the Boston Globe the other day entitled Are We Raising A Generation of Nincompoops?

The piece lists all sorts of things that Kids Today can’t do – they can’t open cans because of pop tops, they can’t tie shoes because of Velcro straps. It’s a litany of things cranky old people are saying about the hopeless imbecility of the age group that is the Future of the Republic.

The columnist quotes from an apparently popular book I haven’t read called “The Dumbest Generation”. Like the column, the title of the book both purports to be addressed to non-dumb people and pulls their strings by giving them a wink and a nod and saying “Hey, this has to do with stupid people – not you.”

Now pay attention to that, because this is about manipulation. Education (both social and formal) is supposed to make adults who are not just able to learn the skills of a trade but to think for themselves; books and articles that purposely dangle provocative titles are about making you read them. There’s nothing wrong with that, we’re in a nation chock full of advertising and a guy’s gotta make a buck. But flattering the public with the title is like smiling in your face while picking your pocket. By all means buy the book if you’re interested — just be mentally agile enough to realize the title’s a magician’s trick of misdirection.

The article’s concerns strike me as empty. In a world of ice makers kids don’t need to know how to use an ice tray and they don’t need to know how to use a can opener if they buy pull tops. As far as I can tell my son can’t write cursive – so what? He’ll never need it. I probably can’t crank-start a Model T or hit a plow horse correctly with a buggy whip.

The column quotes the book that the real issue is “a loss of independence and a loss of initiative” and adds that “growing up with cell phones and Google means kids don’t have to figure things out or solve problems anymore.” That’s not even close to true – kids figure out lots of things; for one thing they can program the cell phone, which many can-opener experts can’t do. I have no interest in playing video games, but I’m amazed at the problem-solving skills needed to get from one level to the next. This generation uses its brains – it just doesn’t use it for the same things as its predecessors.

I’m much more concerned about people who don’t believe in evolution, think Obama’s a Muslim and can’t find Germany on a map. It is amazing to hear tongue clucking about ice trays from a generation that was bamboozled into attacking Iraq because it refused to ask basic questions.

The problem is not Velcro – it is ignorance and it crosses generations. It makes society vulnerable to manipulations by all manner of charlatans and mountebanks.

Posted in Rabble Babble | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

bam pow

An NFL game is about aural and visual bombardment.

I recently went to a New England Patriots’ game in Foxboro, Massachusetts, a town best described as a bunch of gravel lots with a stadium in the middle of it. NFL games are geared for TV – everybody knows that television is the money-maker and that games stop when the networks need to advertise something. This means there are long stretches where players just stand around on the field while guys across New England get up from their sofas to pee, fans actually in the stadium look to the people next to them, nod authoritatively, and inform them “It’s a ‘TV time-out’.”

Everything is about creating noise for TV and keeping the mob occupied. Alcohol is certainly not discouraged in the parking lots before the game, which ensures a well-primed, racket-making crowd. Parking lots are major attractions at football games. People arrive hours before the game and set up tents, tables, and grills (both of the small table-top and large back-yard-gas variety). They have built their day not just around a football game, but having lunch, dinner and happy hour in a dusty gravel lot. Through the years I’ve pointed out to people the oddness of this – and am always greeted with scorn along the lines of “Geezis, he doesn’t even like tailgating.”

Early on, before there are enough butts in the seats, crowd noise is pumped into the stadium through huge loudspeakers, presumably to give the appearance of excitement behind announcers who are standing near the field opining on the efficacy of the nickel defense. Once the game starts loud music blasts when a play isn’t in progress. It’s difficult to see the crowd here as anything other than a prop for television, the one that legitimizes the competition for the folk at home.

Which is not to say the fans aren’t enjoying themselves – they clearly are, and they are whipped into frenzy by a barrage of heavy metal, booming hip-hop bass and flashing messages on the Jumbotron. A family of four will spend at least $500 to go to the game (the third-level seats are $90 a piece, and then there’s parking and food. That doesn’t even count the ubiquitous “replica jerseys” that have players’ names on them and which go for $60-$70 each — at least until the player is traded or has one of his joints explode into shards forever, at which point the price plummets; investing in a replica jersey is something of a gamble).

Around the middle of the second quarter the noise from the loudspeakers somewhat abates, and the fans no longer know how to behave. They become strangely quiet when not being instructed when to yell and chant — although in fairness they do react to big plays on the field with cheers and boos as appropriate [note: I understand that this is supposed to be the point of being there. It just doesn't feel like it is.]

The Jumbotrons show the TV feed at both ends of the stadium and ones’ eyes are constantly drawn to the giant screens, which are bigger than the tiny behemoths far down on the field (admittedly this is the view from the third tier and the players are surely more prominent if you’re in the lower levels of the stands.) We’re used to events where advertisements are always in front of you –  it’s not just another of those aspects of American society people like to cluck about but is a worldwide phenomenon,  in most countries professional soccer players have the sponsors’ names on the front of their jerseys and not teams’ names. In Foxboro there are advertisements and PSAs blasted into the stadium from the Giant Screens. I guess the intention is to make the experience of being at the game remarkably like watching it on television.

The imposed noise, the flashing screens and lights, the drunken screaming – NFL games have become a lot like monster-truck competitions and are similar to the scene in which Luke Wilson is being chased around a cheering stadium by a killing machine in “Idiocracy”.*

The irony isn’t lost on at least one person in the stands when the music choice during a TV timeout is Nirvana’s ode to vacancy, “Smells Like Teen Spirit”.  It’s disappointing, though, when the music cuts off just before the chorus of “I feel stupid, and contagious/Here we are now, entertain us”.

I like football. I grew up watching small college football games in my hometown. I enjoy being at a stadium on a beautiful day. But this is nothing like small-college football. I’ve long given up on the idea that professional or major college sports could keep the spontaneous enthusiasm of those games, at least the spontaneous enthusiasm that’s in my rosy memory. This is big-time, Disney-sure-fire entertainment – with a game in the middle of it.

 ___________________

*“Idiocracy” is an under-appreciated gem. Don’t expect Proust, though.

Posted in Rabble Babble | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Say

If you google “Dictionary of American Slang” you get about five million hits. One of them took me to Amazon.com which indicated that there are two new copies available for $800 each and some used copies that begin at $1.41.

That’s quite a range.

I make a distinction between slang and idioms, and I assume The Dictionary of American Slang does, too (but it might not given it has almost 20,000 entries. I’ll find out, and for less than two dollars).  When I say slang I mean words that are in vogue for a while but wash away with time (and I also mean “white people’s slang”, I can’t keep up with the other stuff).

Example of a word that came and went: groovy is irretrievably associated with hippies of the mid 1960s, not to mention cornball knockoffs of hippies like Sonny and Cher.  It is very hard to use the word groovy in a way that isn’t seen as trying to be ironic or humorous.  No, it’s impossible. If you say groovy with any degree of seriousness people think you’re an idiot.

There are also nicknames that come and go - when’s the last time you ran into someone named Toots?  My understanding, perhaps to be clarified by the under $2 dictionary, is that it was once a man’s nickname, but these days it’s generally used for women (“Sorry, Toots. Buy your own drink.”). I think it has something to do with an alliterative similarity to a word used for “breasts”, which doesn’t explain why some real names have gone from boys to girls, like “Leslie” or “Marion”.*

There are certain slang terms that seem to have been around forever. My vote for most lasting is cool, which probably cropped up in the 1950s and still can be used without drawing a snicker. It has withstood the assault upon it by over the last few decades by chill.  I think that’s because chill is so thought of as a word used by black people that lots of white people feel awkward saying it. Cool was doubtless stolen from black people, too, but nobody remembers that anymore (see “roll, rock and”).

[Note: About 30 years ago an acquaintance said he was going for a “chill and dip”. This meant he was going to (a) hang out with his friends, and (b) take a walk, because when strutting around he dipped his shoulders from side to side. Sadly, I never heard it used again, although that could be because it’s been a while since I hung around with 20-year-old angel-dust-smoking black guys in Harlem. I certainly haven’t heard it from whitey in suburbia, or when in the office.]

Chick has stuck around, most acceptably in chick flick — although certainly at risk, it has not fallen to the same level of disdain as groovy.  People under 40 will look at you oddly if you say chick, but you might get away with it if you give a partial “hey-we’re-both-in-on-this-joke” smirk.

Almost as durable as cool is man when used in the way of “Hey, man” or “Man, that sucks!” As with cool, it has been battered for the last 20 years by another contender, dude. Interestingly, dude popped up in the early 1970s and quickly became outdated before making its comeback in the 1980s.  It’s so strong these days that it can be an entire sentence all by itself, witness:

“Hey, the flight back from Bangkok was great, but there’s this weird growth on my crotch.”

“Duuude.”

I mean, that’s one useful word.  Still, you probably should be careful throwing dude around if you’re wearing a business suit or you’re too old to be wearing your baseball cap backwards.

Man endures.

Why some slang words survive but most disappear is one of those mysteries that can only be accredited to God’s plan, along with everything else we can’t figure out.

_____

* I had a great opportunity to use “Toots” about a year ago when standing at a bar. A young woman asked me to buy her a drink. I said “no”. She made some statement about it being a sad day in America when a girl can’t get a guy to buy her a drink. I said “Go find someone your own age to buy you one”, and she skulked off. I should have added “Toots”, really.  So you don’t think I’m bragging about my moral fortitude: she probably could have stood to lose about twenty pounds.

Posted in Rabble Babble | Tagged , | Leave a comment